Cody v. Neid
213 A.D. 846
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. We are of the opinion that the complaint fails to state a cause of action and also that the Special Term might very properly have declined to assume jurisdiction on the authority of Tracy v. Coyle (121 Misc. 526). (See, also, Evans v. Appell, 211 App. Div. 105.) Present — Hubbs, P. J:, Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cody v. Neid, 213 A.D. 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).
213 A.D. 846 (Cody v. Neid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Estate of Schopperle
189 Misc. 111 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1947)
In re Accounting of First Trust & Deposit Co.
270 A.D. 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)