Cody v. Neid
This text of 213 A.D. 846 (Cody v. Neid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. We are of the opinion that the complaint fails to state a cause of action and also that the Special Term might very properly have declined to assume jurisdiction on the authority of Tracy v. Coyle (121 Misc. 526). (See, also, Evans v. Appell, 211 App. Div. 105.) Present — Hubbs, P. J:, Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 A.D. 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-v-neid-nyappdiv-1925.