Cody v. Neid

213 A.D. 846
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 213 A.D. 846 (Cody v. Neid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cody v. Neid, 213 A.D. 846 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. We are of the opinion that the complaint fails to state a cause of action and also that the Special Term might very properly have declined to assume jurisdiction on the authority of Tracy v. Coyle (121 Misc. 526). (See, also, Evans v. Appell, 211 App. Div. 105.) Present — Hubbs, P. J:, Clark, Sears, Crouch and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Schopperle
189 Misc. 111 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1947)
In re Accounting of First Trust & Deposit Co.
270 A.D. 418 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 A.D. 846, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cody-v-neid-nyappdiv-1925.