Cobb v. State

202 So. 3d 885, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13788
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 14, 2016·No. No. 3D15-1611·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying Appellant Charles Cobb’s (“Cobb”) motion for post-conviction relief. Such affirmance is without prejudice, however, to Cobb filing an appropriate motion in the trial court to raise the legality of his sentence in light of Atwell v. State, 197 So.3d 1040, 41 Fla. L. Weekly S244, 2016 WL 3010795 (Fla. May 26, 2016), Montgomery v. Louisiana, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 718, 193 L.Ed.2d 599 (2016), as revised (Ján. 27, 2016), arid Miller v. Alabama, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). We affirm all other components of the trial court’s order without further discussion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cobb v. State, 202 So. 3d 885, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13788 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

202 So. 3d 885 (Cobb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Montgomery v. Louisiana
577 U.S. 190 (Supreme Court, 2016)
Angelo Atwell v. State of Florida
197 So. 3d 1040 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)