Cobb v. State

177 So. 3d 312, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15038, 2015 WL 5918758
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 9, 2015·No. 2D14-5793·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Almond v. State, 89 So.3d 1056, 1058 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (holding that when a criminal court still has jurisdiction over a defendant whose criminal record mandates the court to classify him as a sexual predator, the criminal court may designate the defendant as a sexual predator even though the designation was overlooked at sentencing many years earlier); Moore v. State, 880 So.2d 826, 828-29 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (collecting cases).

LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cobb v. State, 177 So. 3d 312, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 15038, 2015 WL 5918758 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

177 So. 3d 312 (Cobb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. State
880 So. 2d 826 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Almond v. State
89 So. 3d 1056 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)