Cobb v. State

554 So. 2d 666, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 57, 1990 WL 750
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 1990·No. No. 88-02687·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the sentence imposed upon defendant upon the revocation of his probation and remand for conformity of the sentence to the trial court’s oral pronouncement. The oral pronouncement imposed 120 days in the county jail, to be suspended when defendant brought current the amounts he owed for restitution and apparently costs of probation supervision. The written order and judgment of guilt indicated, however, that defendant was to be additionally placed on two years probation.

There is no merit in defendant’s additional contention.

Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cobb v. State, 554 So. 2d 666, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 57, 1990 WL 750 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

554 So. 2d 666 (Cobb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anderson v. State
630 So. 2d 1138 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
McDonald v. State
564 So. 2d 523 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Singleton v. State
561 So. 2d 1296 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)