C.M. Thibodaux, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

871 So. 2d 351, 2004 La. LEXIS 1032, 2004 WL 1113371
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 26, 2004·No. No. 2004-CC-0210·Published

Opinion

In re Atofina Petrochemicals Inc. et al.; Kerr-MeGee Oil & Gas Corp.; Shell Oil Co.; Shell Offshore Inc.; SWEPI LP; Amerada Hess Corp.; Chevron U.S.A. Inc.; Texaco Inc.; Amoco Production Co.; BP America Production Co.; Arco Oil & Gas Co.; EOG Resources Inc.; Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. (LL & E); Marathon Oil Co.; Union Oil Co. of California (UNOCAL); Oxy U.S.A. Inc.; Placid Oil Co.; Sexton Oil & Minerals Corp.; — Defendants); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. I, No. 2001-16872; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2003-C-1958.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C.M. Thibodaux, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 871 So. 2d 351, 2004 La. LEXIS 1032, 2004 WL 1113371 (La. 2004).

871 So. 2d 351 (C.M. Thibodaux, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.