C.M. Thibodaux, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
This text of 865 So. 2d 86 (C.M. Thibodaux, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Atofina Petrochemicals Inc. et al.; Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp.; Shell Oil Co.; Shell Offshore Inc.; SWEPI LP; Amerada Hess Corp.; Chevron U.S.A. Inc.; Texaco Inc.; Amoco Production Co.; BP America Production Co.; Arco Oil & Gas Co.; Conoco Phillips Co.; EOG Resources Inc.; Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. (LL & E); Marathon Oil Co.; Union Oil Co. of California (UNOCAL); Oxy U.S.A. Inc.; Placid Oil Co.; Sexton Oil & Mineral Corp.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. I, No. 01-16872; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2003-C-1001.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
865 So. 2d 86, 2004 La. LEXIS 343, 2004 WL 353010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cm-thibodaux-ltd-v-exxon-mobil-corp-la-2004.