C.M. Thibodaux, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

865 So. 2d 86, 2004 La. LEXIS 343, 2004 WL 353010
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 30, 2004·No. No. 2003-CC-3143·Published

Opinion

In re Atofina Petrochemicals Inc. et al.; Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Corp.; Shell Oil Co.; Shell Offshore Inc.; SWEPI LP; Amerada Hess Corp.; Chevron U.S.A. Inc.; Texaco Inc.; Amoco Production Co.; BP America Production Co.; Arco Oil & Gas Co.; Conoco Phillips Co.; EOG Resources Inc.; Louisiana Land & Exploration Co. (LL & E); Marathon Oil Co.; Union Oil Co. of California (UNOCAL); Oxy U.S.A. Inc.; Placid Oil Co.; Sexton Oil & Mineral Corp.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. I, No. 01-16872; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2003-C-1001.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C.M. Thibodaux, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 865 So. 2d 86, 2004 La. LEXIS 343, 2004 WL 353010 (La. 2004).

865 So. 2d 86 (C.M. Thibodaux, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.