Cloud v. Hightower

111 S.E. 384, 152 Ga. 761, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 274
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 18, 1922·No. No. 2542·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

I’ish, C. J.

The evidence submitted before the judge of a city court, on the trial of a habeas-corpus case, not demanding the judgment rendered by him, the discretion of the judge of the superior court in sustaining [762] a certiorari and granting a first new trial will not be interfered with by the Supreme Court. Bell v. Askins, 150 Ga. 635 (104 S. E. 421), and cases cited; Civil Code (1910), § 6204.

No. 2542. February 18, 1922. Certiorari. Before Judge Kent. Laurens superior court. February 22, 1921. Burch & Daley, for plaintiff in error. ■J. B. Hides, T. B. Hightower, J. S. Adams, and B. B. Camp, contra.

■Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cloud v. Hightower, 111 S.E. 384, 152 Ga. 761, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 274 (Ga. 1922).

111 S.E. 384 (Cloud v. Hightower) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coursey v. Coursey
135 S.E. 718 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)