Bell v. Askins
104 S.E. 421, 150 Ga. 635, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 262
Opinion
The evidence submitted before the ordinary on the trial of a habeas-corpus case not demanding the judgment rendered by him, the discretion of the judge of the superior court in sustaining a certiorari and granting a first new trial will not be interfered with by the Supreme Court. Flanders v. Wood, 113 Ga. 635 (38 S. E. 975) ; Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43 (45 S. E. 722) ; Bryant v. Ridgeway, 126 Ga. 733 (55 S. E. 932); Civil Code (1910), § 6204.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bell v. Askins, 104 S.E. 421, 150 Ga. 635, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 262 (Ga. 1920).
104 S.E. 421 (Bell v. Askins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Coursey v. Coursey
135 S.E. 718 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1926)
Cloud v. Hightower
111 S.E. 384 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)