Bell v. Askins
This text of 104 S.E. 421 (Bell v. Askins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence submitted before the ordinary on the trial of a habeas-corpus case not demanding the judgment rendered by him, the discretion of the judge of the superior court in sustaining a certiorari and granting a first new trial will not be interfered with by the Supreme Court. Flanders v. Wood, 113 Ga. 635 (38 S. E. 975) ; Shirley v. Swafford, 119 Ga. 43 (45 S. E. 722) ; Bryant v. Ridgeway, 126 Ga. 733 (55 S. E. 932); Civil Code (1910), § 6204.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
104 S.E. 421, 150 Ga. 635, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bell-v-askins-ga-1920.