Close v. United States
52 Cust. Ct. 374, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3438
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Close v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 58 Cust. Ct. 350 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 11, 1964·No. No. 68630; protest 63/4466 (Seattle)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the items, described on the invoice as one slice and four wafers of indium antimonide, are, in fact, metal articles suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Close v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 374, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3438 (cusc 1964).
52 Cust. Ct. 374 (Close v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.