Close v. United States
52 Cust. Ct. 374, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3438
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 11, 1964
DocketNo. 68630; protest 63/4466 (Seattle)
StatusPublished
This text of 52 Cust. Ct. 374 (Close v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Close v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 374, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3438 (cusc 1964).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the items, described on the invoice as one slice and four wafers of indium antimonide, are, in fact, metal articles suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
52 Cust. Ct. 374, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/close-v-united-states-cusc-1964.