Close v. Judson

34 Tex. 288
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1871
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 34 Tex. 288 (Close v. Judson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Close v. Judson, 34 Tex. 288 (Tex. 1871).

Opinion

Walker, J.

This was an action brought ¡in sthe district court, in which the plaintiff set out in his petition the statement-of an account between himself and the defendant, and made by the defendant; also two letters written by the defendant to the plaintiff, in which the defendant acknowledged certain sums of ¡money due from him to the plaintiff.

These instruments were made the foundation ef the action, and the plaintiff averred «their execution by the defendant.

There was no' plea ef non est factum, nor did the defendant •deny the execution ef these papers under oath, but he objected to 'the reading of them on the trial. The objection was overruled by the court, and, we think, properly. The case of Fulshear v. Randon, 18 Texas, 275, and the case of Prince v. Thompson, 21 Texas, 480, are all sufficient authority in ¡this case.

We discover no error in the record-on which to reverse -the judgment in this case, .and .it .is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gothard v. Saunders
415 S.W.2d 718 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Tex. 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/close-v-judson-tex-1871.