Close & Stewart v. United States

21 Cust. Ct. 204, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 640
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Close & Stewart v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 Cust. Ct. 25
United States Customs Court·Decided September 27, 1948·No. No. 52555; petition 6625-R (Seattle)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial the customs broker and the sole owner of the petitioner testified that when he prepared the entry he made an error in that he [205]*205failed to include certain items as dutiable items; that he deducted what he thought were the transportation charges, which were shown twice on the invoice and were deducted as one item; and that when it was called to his attention, he paid the increased duty. On the record presented it was held that the petitioner acted without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Close & Stewart v. United States, 21 Cust. Ct. 204, 1948 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 640 (cusc 1948).

21 Cust. Ct. 204 (Close & Stewart v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.