Close & Stewart v. United States

16 Cust. Ct. 325, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 454
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedFebruary 14, 1946
DocketNo. 6255; Entry No. 39-S, etc.
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Cust. Ct. 325 (Close & Stewart v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Close & Stewart v. United States, 16 Cust. Ct. 325, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 454 (cusc 1946).

Opinion

Ekwall, Judge:

These cases, which have been consolidated, involve the value for duty purposes of certain merchandise invoiced as mill feed and oat middlings imported at the port of Spokane, Wash. At the hearing held at Seattle, it was agreed by counsel that the export value of the merchandise on the date of exportation was the invoiced unit prices per ton of 2,000 pounds, less nondutiable charges totaling United States dollars, 13.64, United States dollars 2.50 per consular fee, and United States dollars 234.27 for freight, as to each entry. It was further agreed that the foreign value as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 was no higher on the date of exportation than the amount set forth above.

In view of this stipulation I find that the proper basis of value for this merchandise is the foreign value as defined in said section 402 (c) .and that such values are the invoiced unit prices per ton of 2,000 •pounds, less nondutiable charges totaling $13.64, consular fee of $2.50, .•and $234.27 for freight; as to each entry, all values in United States dollars.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Cust. Ct. 325, 1946 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/close-stewart-v-united-states-cusc-1946.