Clise v. Carroll
300 P. 1047, 163 Wash. 704, 1931 Wash. LEXIS 733
Opinion
One of the judges of this court being incapacitated and absent on account of illness, this case was argued to the remaining eight judges sitting En Banc. These eight judges are divided in their opinions and there i,s no majority either for affirmance or for reversal.
Therefore the judgment of the lower court stands affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clise v. Carroll, 300 P. 1047, 163 Wash. 704, 1931 Wash. LEXIS 733 (Wash. 1931).
300 P. 1047 (Clise v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Taxpayers v. Remann
190 P.2d 95 (Washington Supreme Court, 1948)
Serra v. National Bank of Commerce
178 P.2d 303 (Washington Supreme Court, 1947)
Wool Growers Service Corp. v. Simcoe Sheep Co.
140 P.2d 512 (Washington Supreme Court, 1943)
Culliton v. Chase
22 P.2d 1049 (Washington Supreme Court, 1933)