Clise v. Carroll
300 P. 1047, 163 Wash. 704, 1931 Wash. LEXIS 733
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 2, 1931
DocketNo. 23267. En Banc.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 300 P. 1047 (Clise v. Carroll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Clise v. Carroll, 300 P. 1047, 163 Wash. 704, 1931 Wash. LEXIS 733 (Wash. 1931).
Opinion
One of the judges of this court being incapacitated and absent on account of illness, this case was argued to the remaining eight judges sitting En Banc. These eight judges are divided in their opinions and there i,s no majority either for affirmance or for reversal.
Therefore the judgment of the lower court stands affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State Ex Rel. Taxpayers v. Remann
190 P.2d 95 (Washington Supreme Court, 1948)
Serra v. National Bank of Commerce
178 P.2d 303 (Washington Supreme Court, 1947)
Wool Growers Service Corp. v. Simcoe Sheep Co.
140 P.2d 512 (Washington Supreme Court, 1943)
Culliton v. Chase
22 P.2d 1049 (Washington Supreme Court, 1933)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
300 P. 1047, 163 Wash. 704, 1931 Wash. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clise-v-carroll-wash-1931.