Clisby v. State
456 So. 2d 98, 1983 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4219
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 29, 1983·No. 6 Div. 576·Published·Cited by 11 cases
Opinion
AFTER REMANDMENT
In compliance with the direction of the Supreme Court of Alabama in Clisby v. [99]*99State, 456 So.2d 95 (Ala.1983), this cause is remanded for the trial court’s reconsideration of its handling of Dr. Estock’s report in view of the holdings of Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 1866, 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981), and Proffitt v. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227 (11th Cir.1982).
REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Appeal after remand, Ala.Cr.App., 456 So.2d 99.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clisby v. State, 456 So. 2d 98, 1983 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4219 (Ala. Ct. App. 1983).
456 So. 2d 98 (Clisby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
George v. State
717 So. 2d 849 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
Coral v. State
628 So. 2d 988 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)
Willie Clisby, Cross-Appellant v. Charlie Jones, Warden, Holman Unit, Alabama Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellee
960 F.2d 925 (Eleventh Circuit, 1992)
Davis v. State
549 So. 2d 577 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1989)
Nelson v. State
511 So. 2d 225 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Musgrove v. State
519 So. 2d 565 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1986)
Ex Parte Grayson
479 So. 2d 76 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1985)
Giles v. State
554 So. 2d 1073 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1985)
Lynn v. State
477 So. 2d 1365 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)