Clisby v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Clisby v. State

456 So. 2d 98, 1983 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4219

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

DecidedMarch 29, 1983

Docket6 Div. 576

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 456 So. 2d 98 (Clisby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clisby v. State, 456 So. 2d 98, 1983 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 4219 (Ala. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

AFTER REMANDMENT

BOWEN, Judge.

In compliance with the direction of the Supreme Court of Alabama in Clisby v. [99]*99State, 456 So.2d 95 (Ala.1983), this cause is remanded for the trial court’s reconsideration of its handling of Dr. Estock’s report in view of the holdings of Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 101 S.Ct. 1866, 68 L.Ed.2d 359 (1981), and Proffitt v. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227 (11th Cir.1982).

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Appeal after remand, Ala.Cr.App., 456 So.2d 99.

DeCARLO, P.J., and TYSON and HARRIS. JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI