Clinton Foods, Inc. v. Frozen Foods, Inc.

130 F. Supp. 422, 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3371
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedApril 22, 1955
DocketCiv. Nos. 5302-M, 5525-M
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 130 F. Supp. 422 (Clinton Foods, Inc. v. Frozen Foods, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clinton Foods, Inc. v. Frozen Foods, Inc., 130 F. Supp. 422, 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3371 (S.D. Fla. 1955).

Opinion

HOLLAND, Chief Judge.

These causes came on for trial before the Court. After the presentation of evidence, argument of counsel and full consideration, the Court rules as follows:

Pleadings and Issues Created.

1. In the first suit, 5302-M-Civil, Clinton Foods, Inc., sues Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami, a Florida corporation, and Viggo W. Jacobsen and Gladys H. Jacobsen, co-partners, formerly trading and doing business as Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, for merchandise sold in the amount of $20,086.19, during the period August 31, 1953, to October 30, 1953.

The correct amount due on the account stated has been stipulated by counsel for the respective parties to be the sum of $17,826. Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami admits liability for the stipulated amount. Mr. and Mrs. Jacobsen deny all liability.

2. Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami in the second suit, 5525-M-Civil, claim rights under two agreements, Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 11 in Case 5302 and Plaintiff’s Exhibit “A” in Case 5525; one dated November 12, 1951, relating to juice dispensers alone and not to products sold or to be sold; and one dated May 21, 1952, creating a primary distributorship relationship. These two agreements were between Clinton Foods, Inc. and the partnership.

Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami under the original name of Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc., was organized February 3, 1953. Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami, on the basis of ownership of the rights under these two agreements, with the alleged transfer from the partnership to the corporation, with the knowledge and consent of Clinton Foods, Inc., claims damages against Clinton Foods, Inc., in the second suit for breach of the terms of the agreement. Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami claims proper notice of cancellation was not given to them, both contrary to the terms of a contractual provision in one agreement, and failure to give reasonable notice under the other. The Jacobsens are not parties to the second suit.

3. The two cases were consolidated for the purpose of trial.

Positions Taken by the Parties.

1. Clinton Foods, Inc., disclaims recognition of Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami as changing its original relationship with the partnership, and insists that the partnership is liable for the merchandise sold. In the first suit Clinton Foods, Inc., sues both Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami and the Jacobsens. As a creditor, the mere suing of both is not inconsistent with its position of claiming the continued partnership liability and the corporate liability. In the second suit, 5525-M-Civil, Clinton Foods, Inc., disclaims any recognition of Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami as its debtor and contractor, and maintains its actions in the sale of merchandise were with the Jacobsens, and that there is no predicate for liability to Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami.

2. Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami admits it was the recipient of the merchandise sold and sued for in the first suit and that it owes Clinton Foods, Inc., the stipulated amount. Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami maintains that it took by assignment all rights of distributorship enjoyed by the Jacobsens, as a [424]*424partnership, and this with the knowledge and consent of Clinton Foods, Inc. Under these agreements Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami claims breaches of contract by Clinton Foods, Inc., and says that it has been damaged thereby.

Findings of Fact.

1. Viggo W. Jacobsen was General Manager of Miami Quick Freeze and Storage Co. The beginning of this representation is immaterial. He was General Manager at all times incident to this litigation.

2. The Jacobsens formed a partnership in November, 1951, for the purpose of distributing the dispensers under the first agreement. In May, 1952, the business was expanded and. was conducted under the second agreement with Clinton Foods, Inc., to include the distribution of Snow Crop frozen food products. This business was continued up to February 28, 1953, when Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc., which was organized February 3, 1953, commenced business March 1, 1953. All of the partnership assets were assigned to the corporation, Plaintiff’s Exhibit “B” for Identification in Case No. 5525-M-Civil, in consideration for an equal value of capital stock in the corporation. All of the capital stock of the corporation was owned by Mr. and Mrs. Jacobsen, except, two shares issued to their attorney ás a nominal and qualifying stockholder. Mr. Jacobsen was President and Mrs. Jacobsen was Secretary and Treasurer. The assignment of partnership assets to the corporation was general in its terms and attempted to specifically assign the rights under the two contracts.

3. After March 1, 1953, the business continued and merchandise was sold by Clinton Foods, Inc., on the same procedure and terms of payment as theretofore. By acquiesced consent of Clinton Foods, Inc., and Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc., the terms theretofore controlling were followed in the withdrawal of merchandise from the warehouse of Miami Quick Freeze and Storage Co., and payment by Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc., to Clinton Foods, Inc. There was no new agreement between Clinton Foods, Inc., and Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc., as to the distributorship, and no formal recognition by Clinton Foods, Inc., of a new arrangement with Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc., as its new distributor.

4. Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc., indicated the change in the entity conducting the business venture to that of corporate status by advertisements, checks in payment of accounts, and in the normal conduct and correspondence to the business world with which it came in contact that the corporation was distributing for Clinton Foods, Inc., in the designated territory.

5. The correspondence generally between Clinton Foods, Inc., and Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc., brought home to Clinton Foods, Inc., the facts with which Clinton Foods, Inc., is charged with notice, that this change to corporate status had been effected.

6. In August, 1953, relations began to become strained between Clinton Foods, Inc., and Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc. This arose after continued disagreements as to the accuracy of invoices as to amounts due and resulted in the lack of complete agreement as to Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc.’s line of credit. About the middle of September, 1953, Clinton Foods, Inc., notified Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc., of a cancellation of its distributorship representation to become effective October 17, 1953. One of the results of this continued strained relationship was that Snow Crop Distributors of Miami, Inc., changed its corporate name to that of Frozen Foods, Inc. of Miami on September 23, 1953.

7. Clinton Foods, Inc., contends that the Jacobsens should be held liable as partners for the sums due on the basis that the merchandise was withdrawn pursuant to a scheme to defraud them; because Mr. Jacobsen was General Manager of the warehouse, Miami [425]*425Quick Freeze and Storage Co., where the goods were stored, and he in that capacity signed all of the warehouse delivery memos, and at the same time he was the President of the Miami Corporation, thereby allowing his corporation to withdraw goods from the warehouse in the name of the partnership and without including the name of “Inc.”, designating the corporate entity, and thereafter the Jacobsens sold their interest in the corporation. With this contention the Court disagrees, by reason of the following facts:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayo v. Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc.
43 Fla. Supp. 42 (Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 F. Supp. 422, 1955 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clinton-foods-inc-v-frozen-foods-inc-flsd-1955.