Clifton v. Carson Naval Stores Co.
122 S.E. 639, 32 Ga. App. 51, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 251
Opinion
“No brief filed in this court by an attorney who, at the time the case to which such brief relates is called in its order for a hearing, is not a licensed practitioner at this bar, will be considered; and . . where no appearance is made for the plaintiff in error other than by the filing of such brief, the case will be dismissed for want of prosecution.” Brice v. Chapman, 95 Ga. 799 (2) (22 S. E. 525). Under the foregoing ruling the writ of error in this case must be
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clifton v. Carson Naval Stores Co., 122 S.E. 639, 32 Ga. App. 51, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 251 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
122 S.E. 639 (Clifton v. Carson Naval Stores Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry L. Sawyer Co. v. Boyajian
5 N.E.2d 348 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1936)
Northwestern National Insurance v. Averill
42 P.2d 747 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1935)