Northwestern National Insurance v. Averill

42 P.2d 747, 149 Or. 672, 1935 Ore. LEXIS 180
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided March 26, 1935·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

CAMPBELL, C. J.

Plaintiff is a fire insurance corporation organized under the laws of the state of Wisconsin. It brought this action against the insurance commissioner of this state, on a stipulation of facts, for the purpose of testing the constitutionality of the Oregon statute relating to the appointment and licensing of more than one agent in the cities of this state: Oregon Code 1930, §§ 46-1604, 46-1608.

The circuit court entered judgment against plaintiff and it attempted to appeal to this court by giving *673 a notice of appeal not signed by appellant or by any attorney of this court. Tbe notice of appeal came to our attention and the question is, should the court on its own motion dismiss the appeal?

We agree with counsel that it is not the policy of this court to dismiss appeals on mere technicalities. Neither is it the policy of the court to assume jurisdiction of causes unless the plain provisions of the statute conferring jurisdiction have been complied with. The appeal should be dismissed on the authority of Estate of Nelson, 101 Or. 14 (198 P. 892). The principles announced in that case are in strict conformity with the statute, and we see no reason for overruling that authority in the instant case.

The appeal will be dismissed.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Northwestern National Insurance v. Averill, 42 P.2d 747, 149 Or. 672, 1935 Ore. LEXIS 180 (Or. 1935).

42 P.2d 747 (Northwestern National Insurance v. Averill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hejazi v. State of Oregon
501 P.3d 98 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)
State v. Woodward
383 A.2d 661 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1978)