Clifton v. Allegheny County

980 A.2d 27, 602 Pa. 210, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1614
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 7, 2009·No. Application 20 WAP 2007, 21 WAP 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

[211]*211 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of August, 2009, the County’s Application for Relief and for Stay of Remand of Record is DENIED, and the Prothonotary is directed to remand the record pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 2752(b)(2). The Application for Counsel Fees of Kenneth Pierce and Stephanie Beechaum, appellees in No. 21 WAP 2007, is DENIED. Appellees’ request for an award of costs and reasonable counsel fees incurred in responding to the County’s Application for Stay and Remand of Record is also DENIED.

Justice BAER files a dissenting statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clifton v. Allegheny County, 980 A.2d 27, 602 Pa. 210, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1614 (Pa. 2009).

980 A.2d 27 (Clifton v. Allegheny County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clifton v. Allegheny County
980 A.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2009)