Cliff v. Tedford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cliff v. Tedford

255 A.D.2d 861, 682 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12770

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 25, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D.2d 861 (Cliff v. Tedford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cliff v. Tedford, 255 A.D.2d 861, 682 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondents which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney-General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue in this proceeding has been administratively reversed and that all references to the disciplinary hearing will be expunged from petitioner’s record. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is moot and the petition is dismissed (see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondents which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

The Attorney-General has advised this Court by letter that the determination at issue in this proceeding has been administratively reversed and that all references to the disciplinary hearing will be expunged from petitioner’s record. Because petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is moot and the petition is dismissed (see, Matter of Witherspoon v Goord, 243 AD2d 931).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 861, 682 N.Y.S.2d 636, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cliff-v-tedford-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack