Home/Supreme Court/Cleveland v. Wilken

Cleveland v. Wilken

525 U.S. 867, 142 L. Ed. 2d 132, 119 S. Ct. 161, 67 U.S.L.W. 3024, 1998 U.S. LEXIS 5583
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 5, 1998
DocketNo. 98-14
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 525 U.S. 867 (Cleveland v. Wilken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland v. Wilken, 525 U.S. 867, 142 L. Ed. 2d 132, 119 S. Ct. 161, 67 U.S.L.W. 3024, 1998 U.S. LEXIS 5583 (1998).

Opinion

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alvarez v. United Parcel Service Co.
398 F. Supp. 2d 543 (N.D. Texas, 2005)
Elvig v. Ackles
98 P.3d 524 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2004)
Penley v. CL Westbrook, Jr.
146 S.W.3d 220 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2004)
SHC v. Lu
54 P.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2002)
McKelvey v. Pierce
800 A.2d 840 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)
United States Ex Rel. Aleman v. Sternes
205 F. Supp. 2d 906 (N.D. Illinois, 2002)
William Bracy and Roger Collins v. James Schomig and Roger Cowan
248 F.3d 604 (Seventh Circuit, 2001)
Harris v. Philip Morris Inc.
232 F.3d 456 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
Turner v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
18 S.W.3d 877 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Kirk v. Commonwealth
6 S.W.3d 823 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1999)
United States Ex Rel. Collins v. Welborn
79 F. Supp. 2d 898 (N.D. Illinois, 1999)
CJC v. Corporation of Catholic Bishop
985 P.2d 262 (Washington Supreme Court, 1999)
Sanchez v. Liggett & Myers, Inc.
187 F.3d 486 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Watson
102 F. Supp. 2d 351 (S.D. Texas, 1999)
Smith v. Raleigh District of the North Carolina Conference of the United Methodist Church
63 F. Supp. 2d 694 (E.D. North Carolina, 1999)
American Casualty Co. of Reading v. Krieger
181 F.3d 1113 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
Doe v. Hartz
52 F. Supp. 2d 1027 (N.D. Iowa, 1999)
David Matsuura, Individually and Dba Orchid Isle Nursery, and Stephen Matsuura, Individually and Dba Hawaiian Dendrobium Farm, Plaintiffs-Counter v. Alston & Bird, a Georgia Partnership Including Professional Corporations, and E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Counter David Matsuura, Individually Dba Orchid Isle Nursery Stephen Matsuura, Individually Dba Hawaiian Dendrobium Farm v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
166 F.3d 1006 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
Matsuura v. Alston & Bird
166 F.3d 1006 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
Cairns v. Franklin Mint Co.
24 F. Supp. 2d 1013 (C.D. California, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
525 U.S. 867, 142 L. Ed. 2d 132, 119 S. Ct. 161, 67 U.S.L.W. 3024, 1998 U.S. LEXIS 5583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-wilken-scotus-1998.