Cleveland v. State

563 So. 2d 62, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 159, 1990 WL 68605
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cleveland v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 570 So. 2d 855
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided March 30, 1990·No. 7 Div. 77·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

PATTERSON, Judge.

This cause was remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court, 557 So.2d 21, for consideration in light of Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989). The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed because the issue raised by appellant concerning withdrawal of his guilty plea is procedurally barred from review for failure to raise the issue in the circuit court.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland v. State, 563 So. 2d 62, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 159, 1990 WL 68605 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

563 So. 2d 62 (Cleveland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Reed
489 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1989)