Cleveland v. State

563 So. 2d 62, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 159, 1990 WL 68605
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMarch 30, 1990
Docket7 Div. 77
StatusPublished

This text of 563 So. 2d 62 (Cleveland v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland v. State, 563 So. 2d 62, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 159, 1990 WL 68605 (Ala. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

PATTERSON, Judge.

This cause was remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court, 557 So.2d 21, for consideration in light of Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255, 109 S.Ct. 1038, 103 L.Ed.2d 308 (1989). The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed because the issue raised by appellant concerning withdrawal of his guilty plea is procedurally barred from review for failure to raise the issue in the circuit court.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Reed
489 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
563 So. 2d 62, 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 159, 1990 WL 68605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-state-alacrimapp-1990.