Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. URS Co.

71 Ohio St. 3d 1498
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. URS Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 Ohio St. 3d 188
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 20, 1995·No. 95-28; No. 64496·Published

Opinion

On March 13, 1995, appellee/cross-appellant filed a motion for reconsideration of this court’s dismissal of the cross-appeal of the Dow Chemical Company. Included as exhibits to the motion were a combined memorandum in response and in support of the cross-appeal and a motion seeking reconsideration of this court’s entry striking the combined memorandum. Whereas, the filing of the documents tendered as Exhibits A and B is prohibited by the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the exhibits be, and hereby are, stricken, effective March 21, 1995.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. URS Co., 71 Ohio St. 3d 1498 (Ohio 1995).

71 Ohio St. 3d 1498 (Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. URS Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.