Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. URS Co.

646 N.E.2d 463, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3133
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. URS Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 72 Ohio St. 3d 188
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 3, 1995·No. 95-28; No. 64496·Published

Opinion

This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and cross-appeal. On February 15, 1995, this court denied the motion for leave to exceed page limitation on memorandum in response and in support of cross-appeal filed by appellee/eross-appellant, Dow Chemical Company. Whereas appellee/cross-appellant has not timely filed a memorandum in support of cross-appeal in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the cross-appeal of Dow Chemical Company be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. URS Co., 646 N.E.2d 463, 71 Ohio St. 3d 1487, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 3133 (Ohio 1995).

646 N.E.2d 463 (Cleveland City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. URS Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.