Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Shafran

693 N.E.2d 761, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1998·No. No. 97-2647·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. The record clearly indicates respondent’s sincere attempt at rehabilitation. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years with the entire two years stayed, provided (1) that he be monitored by relator, (2) that he be under the continual care of a psychiatrist selected by relator, (3) that he notify relator of any complaints by any person with any disciplinary authority against him, (4) that he fulfill the OLAP contract program, and (5) that he make restitution to his former employee, Rechford, on terms satisfactory to relator. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Shafran, 693 N.E.2d 761, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio 1998).

693 N.E.2d 761 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Shafran) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Shafran
1998 Ohio 593 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)