Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Shafran

693 N.E.2d 761, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 13, 1998
DocketNo. 97-2647
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 693 N.E.2d 761 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Shafran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Shafran, 693 N.E.2d 761, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. The record clearly indicates respondent’s sincere attempt at rehabilitation. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years with the entire two years stayed, provided (1) that he be monitored by relator, (2) that he be under the continual care of a psychiatrist selected by relator, (3) that he notify relator of any complaints by any person with any disciplinary authority against him, (4) that he fulfill the OLAP contract program, and (5) that he make restitution to his former employee, Rechford, on terms satisfactory to relator. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Shafran
1998 Ohio 593 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
693 N.E.2d 761, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-bar-assn-v-shafran-ohio-1998.