Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Santarelli

711 N.E.2d 658, 86 Ohio St. 3d 36
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 23, 1999·No. No. 99-381·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. An indefinite suspension is an appropriate sanction for respondent’s conduct, which occurred during the same time period as the conduct in his previous disciplinary case. See, e.g., Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Chandler (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 491, 692 N.E.2d 568, and Columbus Bar Assn. v. Finneran [38]*38(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 428, 687 N.E.2d 405, in which we imposed an indefinite suspension for conduct that included violations of DR 6-101(A)(3) and 7-102(A)(1). Respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Santarelli, 711 N.E.2d 658, 86 Ohio St. 3d 36 (Ohio 1999).

711 N.E.2d 658 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Santarelli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Santarelli
1999 Ohio 346 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)