Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Podor

647 N.E.2d 470, 72 Ohio St. 3d 40
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 19, 1995·No. No. 94-2648·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months, but this sanction is suspended on the condition that respondent complete a two-year monitored probation as set forth by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Podor, 647 N.E.2d 470, 72 Ohio St. 3d 40 (Ohio 1995).

647 N.E.2d 470 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Podor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Podor
902 N.E.2d 488 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer
1999 Ohio 156 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Mazer
712 N.E.2d 1246 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Podor
1997 Ohio 49 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)