Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Harris

764 N.E.2d 1033, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1502, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 687
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 18, 2002
Docket01-2231
StatusPublished

This text of 764 N.E.2d 1033 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Harris, 764 N.E.2d 1033, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1502, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 687 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

On motion to supplement record. Motion granted. Record to be filed within ten days of the date of this entry.

Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.

On motion to seal supplemental record. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent, would grant the motion to seal, but would make disclosure to the relator.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 N.E.2d 1033, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1502, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-bar-assn-v-harris-ohio-2002.