Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Fox

660 N.E.2d 1140, 74 Ohio St. 3d 585
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 28, 1996·No. No. 95-2536·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommended sanction. Respondent is hereby suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Fox, 660 N.E.2d 1140, 74 Ohio St. 3d 585 (Ohio 1996).

660 N.E.2d 1140 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Fox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Matter of Angler, Ct 2006-0079 (6-15-2007)
2007 Ohio 3246 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Fox
1996 Ohio 250 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)