Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Character-Floyd

699 N.E.2d 922, 83 Ohio St. 3d 306
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 1998·No. No. 98-779·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months with the entire six months stayed, provided that respondent shall pay restitution of $6,000 to members of the Arnold group and $6,000 to Dowlen within ninety days of this order. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur, Moyer, C.J., dissents because he would not stay the six-month suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Character-Floyd, 699 N.E.2d 922, 83 Ohio St. 3d 306 (Ohio 1998).

699 N.E.2d 922 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Character-Floyd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Akron Bar Assn. v. Carr
2012 Ohio 610 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2012)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Character
2011 Ohio 2902 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Toledo Bar Ass'n v. Johnson
903 N.E.2d 306 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)
Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Character-Floyd
1998 Ohio 86 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)