Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Allanson

699 N.E.2d 921, 83 Ohio St. 3d 304
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 1998·No. No. 98-753·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Respondent’s failure to pursue his clients’ interests, his misrepresentation to U’Ren about the status of a claim, and his failure both in this instance and on previous occasions to cooperate in relator’s investigation warrant the suspension. We [306]*306therefore adopt the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Allanson, 699 N.E.2d 921, 83 Ohio St. 3d 304 (Ohio 1998).

699 N.E.2d 921 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Allanson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Allanson
1998 Ohio 90 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)