Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Allanson

699 N.E.2d 921, 83 Ohio St. 3d 304
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 30, 1998
DocketNo. 98-753
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 699 N.E.2d 921 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Allanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Allanson, 699 N.E.2d 921, 83 Ohio St. 3d 304 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Respondent’s failure to pursue his clients’ interests, his misrepresentation to U’Ren about the status of a claim, and his failure both in this instance and on previous occasions to cooperate in relator’s investigation warrant the suspension. We [306]*306therefore adopt the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Allanson
1998 Ohio 90 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 N.E.2d 921, 83 Ohio St. 3d 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-bar-assn-v-allanson-ohio-1998.