Clemons v. Department of Children and Family Services
This text of 59 So. 3d 251 (Clemons v. Department of Children and Family Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert CLEMONS, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, State of Florida, et al., Respondents.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Robert Clemons, pro se, Petitioner.
Jerry Curington, General Counsel, Department of Children and Families, and Gregory D. Venz, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Respondent Department of Children and Family Services; Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent State of Florida.
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See Munn v. Florida Parole Commn., 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
WOLF, WEBSTER, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 So. 3d 251, 2011 WL 1146410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clemons-v-department-of-children-and-family-servic-fladistctapp-2011.