Clemings v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
This text of 21 Mo. App. 606 (Clemings v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The statement did not state a cause of action at common law. No negligence on the part of defendant was alleged. Johnson v. Railroad, 76 Mo. 553. Although double damages were asked, the statement did not state a cause of action under section 809, Revised Statutes. This is true for reasons too clear to require mention. The statement would seem to have been an attempt to state a cause of action under section 806, Revised Statutes. As such an attempt it was, however, a failure because it averred that the failure of defendant “to ring the bell or blow the whistle,” did not occur at a public crossing. The statement stated no cause of action at common law or under our statutes.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Mo. App. 606, 1886 Mo. App. LEXIS 232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clemings-v-chicago-rock-island-pacific-railway-co-moctapp-1886.