Cleary v. Higley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cleary v. Higley

246 A.D. 698

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Derivative stockholders’ action brought for the benefit of Fox Film Corporation. Plaintiffs seek to recover from defendants all the profits made by the syndicate in the 240,000 shares of stock, totaling the sum of approximately $4,000,000, and the damage which they claim Fox Film Corporation suffered as a result of the issuance by it on April 17, 1930, of 1,600,000 shares of its class A stock. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case, without prejudice, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Derivative stockholders’ action brought for the benefit of Fox Film Corporation. Plaintiffs seek to recover from defendants all the profits made by the syndicate in the 240,000 shares of stock, totaling the sum of approximately $4,000,000, and the damage which they claim Fox Film Corporation suffered as a result of the issuance by it on April 17, 1930, of 1,600,000 shares of its class A stock. Judgment dismissing the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case, without prejudice, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Townley and Glennon, JJ.

Cleary v. Higley, 246 A.D. 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 698 (Cleary v. Higley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related