Clearview Properties, L.P. v. T Reit, L.P.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 2, 2009
Docket14-08-00827-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Clearview Properties, L.P. v. T Reit, L.P. (Clearview Properties, L.P. v. T Reit, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clearview Properties, L.P. v. T Reit, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed July 2, 2009

Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed July 2, 2009.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-08-00827-CV

CLEARVIEW PROPERTIES, L.P., Appellant

V.

T. REIT, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 270th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2003-22196

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

T. L. Reit, L.P. obtained a judgment against Clearview Properties, L.P. on May 17, 2006, which was appealed to this court under our appellate case number 14-06-00716-CV.  This is an appeal from a turnover order and a charging order, both signed May 22, 2008, issued in enforcement of the 2006 judgment.


On January 29, 2009, this court issued an opinion in case number 14-06-00716-CV, reversing the portion of the judgment on which the enforcement orders were based.  In response to a notice from this court, appellant asserted that this appeal is moot because the orders being appealed have been rendered a nullity.

Rather than finding that an appeal in this situation is moot, the Texas Supreme Court has held that, if the judgment underlying a turnover order is reversed, the turnover order must also be reversed.  Ross v. Nat=l Center for the Employment of the Disabled, 201 S.W.3d 694, 695 (Tex. 2006); Matthiessen v. Schaefer, 915 S.W.2d 479, 480 (Tex. 1995). 

Accordingly, we reverse the turnover and charging orders signed May 22, 2008, and render a take nothing judgment in the enforcement proceeding.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Guzman, and Boyce.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ross v. NATIONAL CENTER FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF THE DISABLED
201 S.W.3d 694 (Texas Supreme Court, 2006)
Matthiessen v. Schaefer
915 S.W.2d 479 (Texas Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clearview Properties, L.P. v. T Reit, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clearview-properties-lp-v-t-reit-lp-texapp-2009.