Clayton v. State
902 S.W.2d 772, 321 Ark. 496, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 464
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clayton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 321 Ark. 602 →
Opinion
.
Appellant Douglas James Clayton petitions for rehearing on the basis that this court erred in dismissing his appeal on the basis that his notice of appeal was ineffective. See Clayton v. State, 321 Ark. 217, 900 S.W.2d 537 (1995). According to Clayton, we previously granted his motion for rule on the clerk, permitting him to lodge his transcript. See Clayton v. State, 319 Ark. 291, 890 S.W.2d 602 (1995) (Clayton I). We agree that we erred in dismissing the appeal, and we direct the Clerk of the Supreme Court to reinstate the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clayton v. State, 902 S.W.2d 772, 321 Ark. 496, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 464 (Ark. 1995).
902 S.W.2d 772 (Clayton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clayton v. State
890 S.W.2d 602 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)
Clayton v. State
900 S.W.2d 537 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)