Clayton v. State

890 S.W.2d 602, 319 Ark. 291, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 28
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided January 17, 1995·No. CR 94-1446·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, Douglas James Clayton,

has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Ralph M. Cloar, Jr., admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such admission of fault by an attorney in a criminal case is good cause to grant the motion. See Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 904 (1986).

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clayton v. State, 890 S.W.2d 602, 319 Ark. 291, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 28 (Ark. 1995).

890 S.W.2d 602 (Clayton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clayton v. State
902 S.W.2d 772 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1995)