Clay v. City of East Orange
This text of 436 A.2d 553 (Clay v. City of East Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ARTHUR L. CLAY, DAVID SCHULMAN (DAVAL ASSOCIATES) AND ALAN SCHULMAN (PROGRESSIVE REALTY MANAGEMENT CO.), DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CITY OF EAST ORANGE, PHILIP T. MORRIS, VIRGINIA WHITE AND GUS ELMORE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges ALLCORN, FRANCIS and MORTON I. GREENBERG.
H. Neil Broder argued the cause for appellants (Brach, Eichler, Rosenberg, Silver, Bernstein & Hammer, attorneys).
Ernest R. Booker, First Assistant City Counsel, argued the cause for respondents (William H. Eaton, City Counsel, attorney).
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Law Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge Hopkins which is reported at 177 N.J. Super. 79 (Law Div. 1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
436 A.2d 553, 181 N.J. Super. 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-v-city-of-east-orange-njsuperctappdiv-1981.