Clarke v. Bazadone
5 U.S. 212, 2 L. Ed. 85, 1 Cranch 212, 1803 U.S. LEXIS 355
Opinion
CLARKE
v.
BAZADONE.
Supreme Court of United States.
Mason, for the plaintiff in error.
WRIT of error to the general court of the territory north west of the river Ohio.
This court was established by an ordinance of the colonial congress, during the confederation. The only question decided in the case, was, whether the writ of error would lie.
The writ of error was quashed, on the ground that the act of congress establishing the territory had not authorized an appeal or writ of error, to the supreme court of the United States.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clarke v. Bazadone, 5 U.S. 212, 2 L. Ed. 85, 1 Cranch 212, 1803 U.S. LEXIS 355 (1803).
5 U.S. 212 (Clarke v. Bazadone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Hoffman
162 N.E. 403 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1928)
Curless v. Watson
102 N.E. 497 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1913)
Ex parte France
95 N.E. 515 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1911)
Tennessee v. Davis
100 U.S. 257 (Supreme Court, 1880)
United States v. Circuit Judges
70 U.S. 673 (Supreme Court, 1866)
Robinson v. Baillieul
2 Tex. 160 (Texas Supreme Court, 1847)
Yarbrough v. State
2 Tex. 519 (Texas Supreme Court, 1847)