Clark v. United States

Federal Circuit

Clark v. United States

656 F.3d 1317, 2011 WL 3796261

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 27, 2011

Docket2011-5003

StatusUnpublished

This text of 656 F.3d 1317 (Clark v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. United States, 656 F.3d 1317, 2011 WL 3796261 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit VVILLIAM A. CLARK, JAMES P. DAVERN, ROBERT E. FREEBURG, WILLIE R. JOHNSON, ROBERT A. MUSTIN, CAROL RISSER, JOHN DOES 1-4, AND JANE DOES 2-3, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs-Appellants, V. UNITED STATES, Defendar:,t-Appellee. 2011-5003 Appeal from the United States Court of Federa1 Clai1ns in 00-CV-644, Judge Nancy B. Firestone. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of Wil1iam A. Clark, et al.’s unop- posed motion to reform the official caption and the United States’ unopposed motion for an extension of time, until February 21, 201l, to file its brief IT ls ORDERED THAT:

CLARK V. US 2 The motions are granted The revised ofiicial caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT JAN 2 7 2911 /S/ mm H0rba1y Date J an Horba1y cc: Jerrold J. Ganzfried, Esq. Do11g1as K. Mickle, Esq. s8 Clerk FILED U.S. COURT 0F FPPEAE.S FOR THE FEDEBAL _ClRCU|T JAN 2 7 2011 JAN l~§0RBALY CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit VVILLIAM A. CLARK, JAMES P. DAVERN, ROBERT E. FREEBURG, WILLIE R. JOHNSON, ROBERT A. MUSTIN, CAROL RISSER, JOHN DOES 1-4, AND JANE DOES 2-3, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs-Appellants, V. UNITED STATES, Defendar:,t-Appellee. 2011-5003 Appeal from the United States Court of Federa1 Clai1ns in 00-CV-644, Judge Nancy B. Firestone. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of Wil1iam A. Clark, et al.’s unop- posed motion to reform the official caption and the United States’ unopposed motion for an extension of time, until February 21, 201l, to file its brief IT ls ORDERED THAT:

CLARK V. US 2 The motions are granted The revised ofiicial caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT JAN 2 7 2911 /S/ mm H0rba1y Date J an Horba1y cc: Jerrold J. Ganzfried, Esq. Do11g1as K. Mickle, Esq. s8 Clerk FILED U.S. COURT 0F FPPEAE.S FOR THE FEDEBAL _ClRCU|T JAN 2 7 2011 JAN l~§0RBALY CLERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

656 F.3d 1317, 2011 WL 3796261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-united-states-cafc-2011.