Clark v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clark v. State

361 S.W.3d 45, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2011 WL 5921448

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 29, 2011

DocketWD 73106

StatusPublished

This text of 361 S.W.3d 45 (Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. State, 361 S.W.3d 45, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2011 WL 5921448 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alan Clark appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. A jury convicted Clark of first-degree murder, unlawful use of a weapon, and two counts of armed criminal action. In this post-conviction appeal, Clark contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim of prose-cutorial misconduct and his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call a police officer as a witness. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alan Clark appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. A jury convicted Clark of first-degree murder, unlawful use of a weapon, and two counts of armed criminal action. In this post-conviction appeal, Clark contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim of prose-cutorial misconduct and his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call a police officer as a witness. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

361 S.W.3d 45, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2011 WL 5921448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-state-moctapp-2011.