Clark v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clark v. State

361 S.W.3d 45, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2011 WL 5921448

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 657 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 2011·No. WD 73106·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alan Clark appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. A jury convicted Clark of first-degree murder, unlawful use of a weapon, and two counts of armed criminal action. In this post-conviction appeal, Clark contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim of prose-cutorial misconduct and his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call a police officer as a witness. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Alan Clark appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion, following an evidentiary hearing. A jury convicted Clark of first-degree murder, unlawful use of a weapon, and two counts of armed criminal action. In this post-conviction appeal, Clark contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim of prose-cutorial misconduct and his claim that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call a police officer as a witness. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Clark v. State, 361 S.W.3d 45, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1574, 2011 WL 5921448 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

361 S.W.3d 45 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.