Clark v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clark v. State

938 S.W.2d 274, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 2081, 1996 WL 741870

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 24, 1996·No. No. 70163·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Malcolm J. Clark, III, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Malcolm J. Clark, III, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is not clearly erroneous. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum, solely for the use of the parties involved, has been provided explaining the reasons for our decision.

Clark v. State, 938 S.W.2d 274, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 2081, 1996 WL 741870 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

938 S.W.2d 274 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.