Clark v. State
896 S.W.2d 750, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 802, 1995 WL 237675
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. State, 896 S.W.2d 750, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 802, 1995 WL 237675 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
896 S.W.2d 750 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.