Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Clark v. State

Clark v. State

120 S.E. 559, 31 Ga. App. 306, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 910
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 30 Ga. App. 633 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 5, 1923·No. 15026·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The sole assignment of error is upon the ground that the evidence did not authorize the verdict. There was ample evidence to authorize the conviction. The court, having approved the verdict, properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgmenl affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 120 S.E. 559, 31 Ga. App. 306, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 910 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

120 S.E. 559 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.