Clark v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Clark v. State

122 S.E. 626, 32 Ga. App. 78, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 275

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 16, 1924

Docket15361

StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.E. 626 (Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clark v. State, 122 S.E. 626, 32 Ga. App. 78, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 275 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. “In order,to convict a person of knowingly having upon his premises any apparatus for the distilling or manufacturing of intoxicating liquors, it is not necessary for the State to prove, unless it is so charged in the indictment, that a complete apparatus, or all the apparatus necessary for the making of whisky, was found upon the premises.” Strickland v. State, 27 Ga. App. 321 (2) (108 S. E. 124), and citation.

2. Under the above ruling, the defendant’s conviction in the instant case was authorized by the evidence, and the court did not for any reason assigned err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. F. W. Copeland, for plaintiff in error. James Maddox, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI