Clark v. State

138 So. 3d 1104, 2014 WL 1890564, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7046
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 15698
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 12, 2014·No. No. 1D13-5850·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of the appellant’s rule Motion for Post Conviction Relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. However, we remand for correction of scrivener’s errors in the judgment and sentence which are in variance with the sentencing court’s statements during the plea colloquy and its oral pronouncement during sentencing, as the postconviction court recognized in its order summarily denying the appellant’s motion. See Skiba v. State, 67 So.3d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011); Pressley v. State, 726 So.2d 403 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). Specifically, the written judgment should be corrected to reflect that the sentencing court sentenced the appellant to 20 years’ imprisonment, with 10 years’ minimum-mandatory pursuant to section 775.087(2)(a)l., Florida Statutes (2008), for armed robbery; to 20 years’ imprisonment for attempted first-degree felony murder; and to 15 years’ imprisonment for possession of a firearm by a juvenile delinquent found to have committed a felony act.

[1105]*1105AFFIRMED; REMANDED for Correction of Scrivener’s Errors.

WOLF, PADOVANO, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 138 So. 3d 1104, 2014 WL 1890564, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7046 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

138 So. 3d 1104 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pressley v. State
726 So. 2d 403 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Skiba v. State
67 So. 3d 337 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)