Skiba v. State
67 So. 3d 337, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11001, 2011 WL 2694589
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 13, 2011·No. No. 4D10-3810·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The defendant appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm. However, we remand the case to the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error. The trial court announced that the defendant’s sentences would run concurrent, but the sentence on Count IV fails to reflect that information.
Affirmed, but remanded to correct a scrivener’s error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Skiba v. State, 67 So. 3d 337, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11001, 2011 WL 2694589 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
67 So. 3d 337 (Skiba v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Clark v. State
138 So. 3d 1104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)