Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Clark v. State

Clark v. State

976 So. 2d 629, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3060, 2008 WL 595965
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 903 So. 2d 292 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 6, 2008·No. No. 1D07-5868·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges an order denying his facially insufficient motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The order is affirmed without prejudice to the right of the appellant to file a facially sufficient motion for postconvietion relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Burchfield v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, WOLF, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 976 So. 2d 629, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 3060, 2008 WL 595965 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

976 So. 2d 629 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burchfield v. State
907 So. 2d 614 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)