Clark v. State
909 So. 2d 934, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12013, 2005 WL 1813011
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 851 So. 2d 826 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Williams v. State, 888 So.2d 755 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)(holding that Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), “does not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review.”); Burgal v. State, 888 So.2d 702 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)(same).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. State, 909 So. 2d 934, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 12013, 2005 WL 1813011 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
909 So. 2d 934 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Williams v. State
888 So. 2d 755 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Burgal v. State
888 So. 2d 702 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)